Mean Old Man

IF John McCain had been elected president, we'd be at war with half the world by now.

The Iron Sheik

Here's the best and most accurate article ever written on him.

How to Train a Dog of War

"60 Minutes" did a piece on this guy tonight that was pretty interesting.

A New Foreign Policy for America

Sen. Rand Paul outlines his vision.

Is Iraq Unraveling?

Tom Ricks isn't the only one asking that question. Violence is starting to pick up and the government is starting to turn on the so-called Awakening forces rather than bring them into the armed forces as promised.

Many observers argued that "the Surge" didn't really change anything in that country. What really counted was Al Qaeda overstepping itself and alienating the Sunniy population and the United States paying off insurgents not to fight it. Those factors papered over but did not change the fundamental fractures in the country. Daniel Larison says the Surge's failure was predicted years ago.

Andrew Sullivan has more.

But the Republican echo chamber and neo-cons have already been wroking on their "stabbed in the back" argument. The Surge, they'll argue, did work until it was undercut by the evil and incompentent Obama administration.

Why the Surge Worked?

There was no one left to kill.

The End of American Exceptionalism

That's the subtitle of Col. Andrew Bacevich's new book The Limits of Power. Bacevich is famously a conservative who grew exasperated with the Bush administration's foreign policy blunders.

The book is getting a lot of good publicity.

I don't think I'd agree with everything in it. But it sounds provocative:

Here's Bacevich in an interview with The Nation:

"I call myself an Obama-con, Bacevich says, "a conservative who will vote for Obama – because of the Iraq war. He has vowed that he will end the war and withdraw US combat forces. If he does that, it will render a verdict on the Iraq war: that it was a mistake and a failure. That verdict might open up the possibility for a debate about the fundamentals of US foreign policy. If McCain gets elected, the chances of us having that debate are close to zero."
We shouldn't blame George Bush for the underlying assumptions of the global war on terror, Bacevich argues. "Really it was Bill Clinton who more than anybody else made armed intervention a routine aspect of American political life. Yes, George Hebert Walker Bush started the ball rolling with the overthrow of Noriega in Panama followed by Desert Storm followed by the intervention in Somalia. But Clinton picked up the baton in Somalia; Clinton went into Haiti; Clinton went into Bosnia, Clinton went into Kosovo, Clinton pummeled Afghanistan, Iraq and Sudan with bombs and missiles. So there's blame to be shared by both parties."